Monday, January 16, 2006

Baseball history?

I saw an interesting article recently on cnn.com. Apparently some company is suing Major League Baseball for charging licensing fees for MLB baseball stats.

It raises an interesting issue. The statistics are actually just historical facts, claim the plaintiffs, how can you charge fees? As usual, it's big money driving this question. The plaintiffs are a company that operates large online fantasy football leagues. The stats are the lifeblood of the product.

MLB is investing a lot of money and resources into keeping and providing these stats. It's probably a decent source of revenue, also, when you consider that larger outfits such as Elias Sports Bureau, Stats Inc., et. al. are probably paying good sized fees too.
The players' union is in on the deal and would side with MLB on this.

It's always interesting when these issues arise around Baseball because of it's protected status. In this day and age, it's time to consider whether competitive baseball leagues should be allowed to begin playing. I really think that they should consider ways to modernize the leagues with out having to fiddle with the game itself. Like the way European soccer teams can have league mobility. You don't have to tinker with the on-field product to try that.

That'll never happen. Baseball thrives too much on sentimental traditionalism. It's much more within traditional thinking to find new ways to leverage that well-worn baseball branding (like stats licensing fees, or say, Jonny Damon Yankees jerseys) than to think forward and try something outside the box.

4 Comments:

Anonymous Rich Kotite is your momma said...

Hey there mister bloddigy blog blog blogger. I purchase the MLB product for exactly that. Sentimental traditionalism. Ahh the nostalgia. Remember the days of candy corn, and cracker jacks? Of Harry Carry and day games? No - not at all. I remember the days of free open source software, civics on steroids, and plenty of Kelly Clarkson. Ahh, the escape of MLB. Take me to a different place and time.

--kirkman@kirkman.net

7:06 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

..ohh and by the way - I hear ya. Getting roll'in on the blog's tough to do... good luck.

7:11 PM  
Anonymous I think Joe Walton's available said...

ok, one last thing, then i'll stop the annoyance. I just wanted to say this out loud: "Eric Mangina" wtf? Was Nov not available? Geez...

-good night

7:14 PM  
Blogger Donald G. Marino said...

Well, Mr. Kirky Puckett,
I can't bust yer chops too hard. I did name my dog Ripken. Sentimental traditionalism dies hard.

Although, regardless of the circumstances, the greatest shortstop ever to live isn't a bad person to name a dog after.

D

3:32 PM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home